Why did new towns spring up in places that were not near rivers or candles

The correct answer is The towns sprang up along newly laid railroad tracks. Railroads could be built almost  anywhere.

The construction of cities close to rivers and sources of drinking water is explained by several factors: availability of water for drinking and cooking; ability to offer soil fertility to enable planting; potential to sustain livestock production; ease of transport by river, etc.

In addition, this type of location still guaranteed greater protection against attacks by land, since the rivers delayed the entry of attackers in the defended territory.

Question Options:

A.) All of the land near rivers and canals was already occupied by cities and towns.

B.) The United States government sponsored new towns away from rivers and canals to

attract settlers to the West.

C.) The high levels of pollution in the country’s rivers led people to settle areas that were

far from those rivers.

D.) The towns sprang up along newly laid railroad tracks. Railroads could be built almost

anywhere.

The towns sprang up along newly laid railroad tracks. Railroads could be built almost everywhere.

Overtime, new towns has always been developed close to rivers or candles but with the development of railroads, this trend changed. With the railroad tracks and the trains passing on them, the people were able to move quickly to other places, as well as trade very easily.

D.The towns sprang up along newly laid railroad tracks. Railroads could be built almost anywhere.

D.The towns sprang up along newly laid railroad tracks. Railroads could be built almost anywhere.

\

The correct answer is - C.) The towns sprang up along newly laid railroad tracks. Railroads could be built almost everywhere.

Lot of new towns in the United States were established on places that were not close to springs or rivers. That was kind of breaking the unwritten rule, as the human settlements had always been developing next to a freshwater source.

The reason why this trend occurred where the newly laid railroad tracks. With the railroad tracks and the trains passing on them, the people were able to move quickly to other places, as well as trade very easily. The railroads replaced the river's usage for transportation and travel, so the towns didn't had problems developing in places like this since everything became very easily available.

The correct answer is C. New towns sprang up in places that were not near rivers or canals because they did it along newly laid railroad tracks. Railroads could be built almost anywhere, and they constituted a fast commercial connection with other cities, so the water flows were not necessary anymore.

The railroad began to extend from the East Coast towards the center of the country, crossing later the Mississippi, penetrating arid zones without great amount of rivers. But the railroad functioned as a connection between these zones and the big cities of the East Coast, so the settlers could project their own settlements based on the commercial and social advantages that the railroad granted them.

The correct answer is:

D) The towns sprang up along newly laid railroad tracks. Railroads could be built almost anywhere.

The rail network in U.S. initially it traveled short distances or nearby cities, until the first transcontinental railroad began in the year 1860 joining the east coast with California, with the Pacific coast. This allowed many towns and cities to be built along the railroad tracks since the railroad allowed the towns to access the necessary subsistence and trade inputs without the need for a river or a nearby port.

I hope this answer can help you.

Most likely C because the railroads were like the new rivers of the time and attracted settlers because of the business opportunities.

So that during a flood their house would not be destroyed.