How do historians use evidence to create historical narratives?A. They use it to introduce mythological

C

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

b.)they propose the meaning of evidence

d.)they assess the reliability of evidence

Explanation:

options a & c are examples of how anthropologists use evidence to learn about the past.

historians aren't anthropologists.

:)

b.)They propose the meaning of evidence

d.)They assess the reliability of evidence

Historians analyze and compare pieces of evidence to determine the meaning and create a historical story. As evidence emerges, historians will use content knowledge and context from a period to determine the meaning of the evidence. By comparing the evidence to other pieces of evidence from the time or similar source information, the historian can determine if it is a reliable piece of evidence.

Evidence means something that is clear, prominent, that is visible to all. In science the evidence consists of everything that can be used to prove that a particular hypothesis is true or to rule it out.

History is a social science, it aims to understand the past and the tools at its disposal are objects, relics, fossils, but mainly, documents. To use a document as evidence, one must excave the sources of evidence and analize the reliability of evidence. In some contests the evidence requires interpretations, so historians eventually also propose the meaning of the evidence.

Historians use evidence from primary and secondary sources and oral histories to answer their questions.

Explanation:

It is because in History nothing makes sense except evidence, without it, nothing can be proved

They assess the reliability of evidence,  they excavate the sources of evidence,   is how    do historians use evidence to learn about the past

They assess the reliability of evidence 
i think that should be it

They use artifacts as clues of what had happened in the past

Which are the options to choose from ?