# Are America's top chief executive officers (CEO's) really worth all that money? One way to answer this

###### Question:

B: Percent increase for company 24 23 25 18 6 4 21 37

A: Percent increase for CEO 21 25 20 14 -4 19 15 30

Do these data indicate that the population mean percentage increase in corporative revenue (row B) is different from the population mean percentage increase in CEO salary? Use a 5% level of significance.

a) what is the level of significance? State the null and alternative hypotheses. Will you use a left, right or two tailed test?

b) what sampling distribution will you use? what assumptions are you making? compute the value of the sample test statistic. (answer should be: student's t, d. f.=7, d=2.25, t=0.818.)

c) find the P-value. Sketch the sampling distribution and show the area corresponding to the P-value. (answer should be: 0.250 d) based on your answers in parts a-c will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? are the data statistically significant at the level of significance?

e) your conclusion.

Please show all work.

## Answers

2014 - 2009 = 5 years

24% -15% = 9% percentage of SUG missionaries

who are women has risen in 5 years

9% : 5 years = 1.8% in a year is the relative percentage increase

b. For a bond of any maturity, a 1.0 percentage point increase in the market interest rate (rd) causes a larger dollar capital loss than the capital gain stemming from a 1.0 percentage point decrease in the interest rate

Explanation:

This is very true. If market rates reduce by 1.0%, there is a larger drop in the price of a bond than the amount a bond gains in price if interest rates increase by that same 1.0%.

This is why the graph that relates bond prices to yield is concave and I attached a graph as proof.

Notice how the fall in price is greater when interest rate increases.

[tex]Ssuming all else is constant, which of the following statements is CORRECT? a. A 20-year zero coupon[/tex]

50 billion

Explanation:

Investment declines by $130 billion for every 1 percentage point increase in the real interest rate.

Decline in Investment because of higher real interest rate:

= 2 × 100

= $200 billion

Increase in Investment because of higher expected rate of return:

= 1 × 150

= 150 billion

Total decline in investment:

= -200 + 150

= 50 billion

Therefore, 50 billion of investment will be crowding out.

Answer and Explanation:

(1) Decrease in investment = Decrease in money supply / Investment multiplier

= $60 billion / 5 = $12 billion

Real planned investment will decrease by $12 billion

The Federal Reserve decreased money supply by 60 billion and we wish to determine by how much this would affect real planned investment. We have therefore applied the investment multiplier to determine decrease in real planned investment. This is based on Keynes' theory of investment multiplier

answer:

WA TO COMPLICATED

Explanation:

The assumption will depend on the argument that C. Any decrease in per capita sales of cigarettes in Coponia will result mainly from an increase in the number of people who quit smoking entirely.

Step-by-step explanation:

Per capita income or average income measures the average income earned per person in a given area in a specified year. It is calculated by dividing the area's total income by its total population. Per capita income is national income divided by population size.

Tax is a compulsory contribution to state revenue, levied by the government on workers' income and business profits, or added to the cost of some goods, services, and transactions.

The percentage of increase from 511 to 705 would be 38.0% With a difference of 194.

I hope this is the answer you were looking for and that it helps!! :)

38.0% hope this helps